Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun;42:66–71. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.03.007

Table 2.

Mouth cancer in Mumbai 1995–2009, men aged 25–74. Analysis of deviance for nested APC models.

Model No. Model description Goodness-of-fit
Model Comparison Effect Tested Difference between models
dfa Residual Deviance p dfa Deviance p
0 Age 9 149.8 <0.0001
1 Age + drift 10 122.3 <0.0001 1 vs. 0 Drift 1 27.5 <0.0001
2 Age + period 11 118.8 <0.0001 2 vs.1 Non-linear period 1 3.5 0.0080
3 Age + cohort 20 107.7 <0.0001 3 vs.1 Non-linear cohort 10 14.6 0.0012
4 Age+ period + cohortb 21 103.2 <0.0001 4 vs. 3 Non-linear periodc 1 4.5 0.002
4 vs.2 Non-linear cohortc 10 15.6 0.0005
a

Degrees of freedom.

b

Best-fitting APC model on the grounds of significant non-linear period and cohort effects.

c

Period (cohort) adjusted for non-linear cohort (period).