Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 15;36(13):1836–1855. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00189-16

TABLE 4.

Response to sunitinib treatment in CAM assaysa

RCC cell line Treatment Tumor engraftment rate (%) (no. of samples with tumors/total no. of samples) Su/Ve P value
TG206 Vehicle (n = 16) 68.8 (11/16) 0.40 0.037
Sunitinib (n = 18) 27.8 (5/18)
TG158 Vehicle (n = 22) 59.1 (13/22) 0.47 0.042
Sunitinib (n = 25) 28.0 (7/25)
TG185 Vehicle (n = 17) 64.7 (11/17) 0.39 0.022
Sunitinib (n = 20) 25.0 (5/20)
TG127 Vehicle (n = 43) 60.4 (26/43) 0.89 0.628
Sunitinib (n = 28) 53.6 (15/28)
PF22 Vehicle (n = 37) 21.6 (8/37) 1.12 1.000
Sunitinib (n = 29) 24.1 (7/29)
T258 Vehicle (n = 27) 63.0 (17/27) 1.04 1.000
Sunitinib (n = 23) 65.2 (15/23)
TG121 Vehicle (n = 31) 64.5 (20/31) 0.81 0.405
Sunitinib (n = 21) 52.4 (11/21)
a

List of cell lines evaluated for sunitinib sensitivity in CAM assays. Cells are sorted based on sunitinib sensitivity (see Table 3). Sunitinib-resistant cell lines (as determined based on coculture assays) are indicated with boldface characters.