Table 3.
EMR-verified screening mammography receipt within 1-year following randomization in ¡Fortaleza Latina!, by intervention clinic-level and individual-level assignments (n = 536)
| % had mammogram within 1-year following randomization | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allocated to clinic-level intervention | Allocated to clinic-level usual care | p-value | |||||||
| Clinic 1 | Clinic 2 | Clinic 3 | Clinic 4 | ||||||
| Individual-level assignment |
Interv a | UC b | Interv a | UC b | Interv a | UC b | Interv a | UC b | |
| N Participants | 63 | 62 | 44 | 41 | 80 | 71 | 89 | 86 | |
| Observed % | 25.4 | 12.9 | 18.2 | 4.9 | 20.0 | 8.4 | 15.7 | 15.1 | |
| Observed % (N is denominator) Adjustedc % (95% CI) |
22.4 (107) | 9.7 (103) | 17.8 (169) | 12.1 (157) | |||||
| 20.6 (14.1, 29.1) | 11.7 (7.3, 18.2) | 18.9 (13.6, 25.6) | 10.6 (6.9, 16.1) | ||||||
| Intervention effect (individual-level) |
|
P<0.01 | |||||||
a
intervention involving motivational interviewing delivered by promotoras
b
usual care
c
adjusted for clinic or individual intervention assignment level as appropriate (fixed effect) and randomization block nested within age group and clinic (random effects)