Table 3.
Models (rs2290639) | Hong Kong Chinese sample | Strauss’ sample | Overall test | |
---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95 % CI) | OR (95 % CI) | ORb 95 % CI | I2 (P)a | |
Homozygous | ||||
AA versus TT* | 2.36 (1.08–5.19) | 1.43 (0.63–3.24) | 1.86 (1.05–3.29) | 0 % (0.39) |
Heterozygous | ||||
AT versus TT* | 0.74 (0.43–1.26) | 0.31 (0.15–0.67) | 0.50 (0.21–1.16) | 70.8 % (0.06) |
Recessive | ||||
AA versus AT + TT* | 2.78 (1.35–5.71) | 1.57 (0.85–2.89) | 2.01 (1.16–3.52) | 28.7 % (0.24) |
The OR and 95 % CI in significant associations were in italics; the genotype with an asterisk acts as the reference
aI2 (P): heterogeneity test for meta-analysis (P value)
bFixed effect model was adapted to homozygous meta-analysis and random effect model was employed to heterozygous and recessive meta-analyses