Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 17;5(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2461-5

Table 1.

Comparison of signal to noise ratio after ICG signal filtering due to various artifact cancelers (INDBS)

Artifact type Sample no. LMS eN2 LMS SR eN2LMS SE eN2LMS SS eN2LMS N3LMS SR N3LMS SE N3LMS SS N3LMS
BWA Data 1 4.9815 5.8286 7.1277 5.2723 5.0801 8.3075 8.4956 5.7226 5.2454
Data 2 4.9783 5.8251 7.1626 5.2583 5.1438 8.3059 8.5461 5.6331 5.3726
Data 3 4.9876 5.8359 7.1035 5.2348 4.9496 8.3081 8.4711 5.5724 5.3241
Data 4 4.9993 5.8307 7.1964 5.2934 5.1364 8.3317 8.5839 5.6587 5.4356
Data 5 4.9782 5.8289 7.1732 5.1804 5.1423 8.3184 8.5595 5.7144 5.3976
Average 4.1884 5.8298 7.1531 5.2480 5.0904 8.3143 8.5312 5.5502 5.3551
EMA Data 1 4.3813 3.9164 6.8491 3.0812 3.0628 7.4958 7.5570 4.8956 4.7859
Data 2 4.3905 3.9213 6.9333 3.1025 3.0994 7.4984 7.5823 4.8425 4.6926
Data 3 4.3802 3.9172 6.7805 3.1583 3.1133 7.4884 7.6118 4.8520 4.7085
Data 4 4.4016 3.2729 6.8429 3.1693 3.1501 7.5071 7.5523 4.9425 4.6538
Data 5 4.3912 3.9256 7.1351 3.1979 3.1612 7.4979 7.6445 4.8078 4.6705
Average 4.3889 3.9216 6.9081 3.1418 3.1173 7.5268 7.5908 4.8701 4.7022
IMA Data 1 4.0359 3.8136 7.5765 6.2971 4.5841 7.1845 8.4466 7.8773 5.2710
Data 2 4.0256 3.8371 7.5896 6.2309 4.6642 7.1732 8.4371 7.8473 5.1835
Data 3 3.9916 3.8096 7.5669 6.2985 4.7363 7.1686 8.4461 7.8435 5.1477
Data 4 3.9912 3.8140 7.5677 6.2338 4.7059 7.1854 8.4461 7.8435 5.1477
Data 5 3.9939 3.8079 7.5611 6.2145 4.6768 7.1713 8.3606 7.8658 5.2168
Average 4.0076 3.8164 7.5723 6.2551 4.6633 7.1766 8.4231 7.8578 5.1884