Table 1.
The prevalence of Neospora caninum infection in dogs in the People’s Republic of China.
| Provinces/cities | Year of sampling1 | No. tested | Positive (%) | Method2 | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qinghai | 2006 | 80 | 25 (31.25) | ELISA | [26] |
| Urumchi | <2010 | 29 | 5 (17.24) | ELISA | [1] |
| Shenyang | 2012 | 212 | 74 (34.91) | Nested-PCR | [18] |
| Henan | 2013 | 31 | 0 (0.0) | NAT | [35] |
| Anhui | 2013 | 22 | 0 (0.0) | NAT | [35] |
| Jilin | 2013 | 43 | 6 (13.95) | NAT | [35] |
| Beijing | 2013 | 186 | 1 (0.54) | ELISA | [16] |
| Yanbian | <2015 | 27 | 3 (11.11) | ELISA | [30] |
| Kuerle | 2015 | 61 | 14 (22.95) | ELISA | [32] |
| Chuzhou | 2013 | 89 | 3 (3.37) | Nested-PCR | [19] |
| Bengbu | 2013 | 31 | 2 (6.45) | Nested-PCR | [19] |
1
Years of sampling are listed as published in the references. In cases where this information was not available, the year listed here is the year when the study was published, as indicated by “<”.
2
ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; NAT: Neospora agglutination test.