Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 18;7:36. doi: 10.1186/s40104-016-0095-7

Table 4.

Effect of processing conditions on the contents of total and individual glucosinolates in rapeseed products (μmol/g defatted dry matter, unless otherwise stated)a

Rapeseed meal
Item RS RSC I A B C D E
Total glucosinolatesb 34 26 15 12 8 6 4
Progoitrinb 13.4 10.90 6.55 5.01 3.63 2.49 1.72
Gluconapoleiferinb 1.41 1.33 0.83 0.61 0.42 0.01 0.17
Gluconapinb 7.50 5.88 3.76 2.89 2.12 1.56 0.91
4-Hydroxyglucobrassicinb 5.13 3.07 0.98 0.66 0.42 0.24 0.13
Glucobrassicanapinb 4.85 4.03 2.55 1.92 1.40 1.01 0.49
Glucobrassicinb 0.37 0.34 0.18 0.16 0.11 0.09 0.02
Gluconasturtiin 0.43 0.17 0.18 0.21 0.22 0.17 0.16
4-Methoxyglucobrassicinb 0.48 0.63 0.32 0.29 0.16 0.12 0.10
Neoglucobrassicin 0.20 0.08 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 n.d.
Degradation rate of total GSL, %c 22 54 65 75 83 89
Degradation rate of aliphatic GSL, %cd 18 50 62 72 81 88
Degradation rate of indol GSL, %cd 33 76 82 89 93 96

RS = rapeseed; RSC I = rapeseed cake one; GSL = glucosinolates; n.d. = not detectable

aLinear regression analysis refers to the effect of residence time in the desolventizer/toaster on total and individual glucosinolates contents of rapeseed meals A-D. Rapeseed meals A-D represent four differently processed rapeseed meals under standardized and defined conditions in a pilot plant (for details see Table 1)

bLinear decrease (P < 0.05)

cIn comparison to defatted rapeseed

dAliphatic GSL represent the sum of progoitrin, gluconpoleiferin, gluconapin, and glucobrassicanapin; indol GSL that of 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin, glucobrassicin, and neoglucobrassicin