Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2016 Jun 3;197(1):27–41. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502344

Figure 3. Effector T cells from DEREG mice with transient Treg cell depletion are less sensitive to suppression by Treg cells in vitro and in vivo.

Figure 3

Percentages (left) and absolute numbers (right) of (A) PD1+CXCR5+ of CD4+ T follicular helper cells or (B) CD69+ of CD4+Foxp3− activated T cells in the NDLN or SDLN at 3 weeks in Treg cell-depleted DEREG mice with (filled squares) or without (empty circles) WT Treg cell reconstitution at day 0 of DT treatment. (C) Gastritis score (left) and gastric IgG autoantibody intensity (right) at 3 weeks in Treg cell-depleted DEREG mice with or without infusion of WT Treg cells at day 0 or day 7 after the first dose of DT treatment. (D) Suppression of naïve CD4+CD25− T cell proliferation by CD4+CD25+ Treg cells from WT mice or from the SDLN of DEREG mice obtained at 3 weeks after DT treatment. (E) Suppression of proliferation of CD4+CD25− T cells from WT mice or from the SDLN of DEREG mice obtained at 3 weeks after DT treatment by CD4+CD25+ Treg cells from WT mice. Proliferation of CD4+CD25− T cells in D and E was assessed by uptake of [3H]thymidine (representative mean and standard deviations of cpm from 5 wells each in 1 experiment, left; average percent suppression of 2–3 experiments, right). p = 0.0950 in D, p = 0.0280 in E (three-way ANOVA with F-test). Data in A–C were pooled from 3 independent experiments and each symbol represents an individual mouse. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001; Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunns posttests (C) or Mann-Whitney t tests (A, B).