Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 5;2016:6068429. doi: 10.1155/2016/6068429

Table 2.

Comparative susceptibility pattern between indoor and outdoor patients.

Antimicrobial agents Hospitalized patients n = 232 Outdoor patients n = 102 P value
Sensitive
N (%)
Resistant
N (%)
Sensitive
N (%)
Resistant
N (%)
AML 22 (9.48) 210 (90.52) 28 (27.45) 74 (72.55) <0.001
AMC 45 (19.40) 187 (80.60) 37 (36.27) 65 (63.73) <0.0001
TZP 132 (56.90) 100 (43.10) 71 (69.61) 31 (30.39) <0.03
SCF 151 (65.09) 81 (34.91) 80 (78.43) 22 (21.57) <0.02
CEC 40 (17.24) 192 (82.76) 31 (30.39) 71 (69.61) <0.006
CAZ 69 (29.74) 163 (70.26) 42 (41.18) 60 (58.82) <0.041
CRO 76 (32.76) 156 (67.24) 45 (44.12) 57 (55.88) <0.467
FEP 102 (43.97) 130 (56.03) 60 (58.82) 42 (41.18) <0.0123
ENX 75 (32.33) 157 (67.67) 42 (41.18) 60 (58.82) <0.022
GTX 95 (40.95) 137 (59.05) 54 (52.94) 48 (47.06) <0.05
CIP 108 (46.55) 124 (53.45) 60 (58.82) 42 (41.18) <0.0388
SPX 128 (55.17) 104 (44.83) 58 (56.86) 44 (43.14) <0.0427
MXF 134 (57.76) 98 (42.24) 72 (70.59) 30 (29.41) <0.03
E 35 (15.09) 197 (84.91) 29 (28.43) 73 (71.57) <0.0137
CLR 88 (37.93) 144 (62.07) 54 (52.94) 48 (47.06) <0.0106
CN 38 (16.38) 194 (83.62) 24 (23.53) 78 (76.47) <0.0193
AK 140 (60.34) 92 (39.66) 76 (74.51) 26 (25.49) <0.01
DO 12 (5.17) 220 (94.83) 22 (21.57) 80 (78.43) <0.0001
MEM 206 (88.79) 26 (11.21) 98 (96.08) 4 (3.92) <0.032
IPM 189 (81.47) 43 (18.53) 93 (91.18) 9 (8.82) <0.0242