Table 4.
T1 relaxometry for the assessment of liver disease.
Study | Study design | Patients | Main findings |
---|---|---|---|
Smith et al., 1981 | HV vs. patients with diffuse liver disease | HV (n = 15) | Longer T1 in cirrhosis and CAH |
Cirrhosis (n = 5) | |||
CAH* (n = 1) | |||
Doyle et al., 1982 | HV vs. patients with diffuse liver disease | HV (n = 12) | Longer T1 in cirrhosis |
Cirrhosis (n = 10) | |||
The Clinical NMR Group, 1987 | T1 vs. histology | Patients with suspected parenchymal disease (n = 55) | Tendency toward longer T1 in cirrhosis/hepatitis |
Thomsen et al., 1990 | HV vs. disease controls vs. cirrhosis | HV (n = 7) | Longer T1 in cirrhosis |
Disease controls (n = 17) | No association with histology | ||
T1 vs. histology in a subset | |||
Cirrhosis (n = 15) | |||
Histology subset(n = 10) | |||
Keevil et al., 1994 | HV vs. patients with diffuse liver disease | HV (n = 42) | Longer T1 in patients with cirrhosis and CAH |
Liver disease (n = 44) | |||
Heye et al., 2012 | HV vs. cirrhosis | HV (n = 31) | T1 longer in cirrhosis |
Cirrhosis (n = 61) | |||
Kim et al., 2012 | Non cirrhotic patients vs. CHB cirrhosis | Non cirrhotic patients (n = 92) | T1 shorter in cirrhosis |
HBV cirrhosis (n = 87) | |||
Cassinotto et al., 2015 | HV vs. cirrhosis | HV (n = 40) | T1 longer in cirrhosis |
Cirrhosis (n = 89) | |||
Hoad et al., 2015 | T1 vs. histology | Training cohort (n = 64) | AUROC for cirrhosis 0.92 |
Validation cohort (n = 46) | |||
AUROC for advanced fibrosis 0.81 |
HV, healthy volunteers; CAH, chronic active hepatitis; HBV, hepatitis B virus; AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Chronic active hepatitis is a historical term used to describe a hepatitis of unknown etiology, now believed to be chronic hepatitis C and is no longer used in clinical practice.