Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 20;148(3):304–314. doi: 10.1111/imm.12612

Table 1.

Proportion of interferon‐γ‐ or IL‐10‐positive cells in mesenteric lymph node cell subsets

IFN‐γ positive cells
Germ‐free E. coli monoassociated for 4 days
Percent of subset in MLNa Percent IFN‐γ‐positive of subsetb Percent of subset in MLN Percent IFN‐γ‐positive of subset
CD4 32·8 ± 1·6 0·74 ± 0·06 31·5 ± 1·9 1·13 ± 0·06**
CD8 14·8 ± 0·7 10·68 ± 0·83 12·3 ± 0·7 11·46 ± 0·55
NKp46 0·39 ± 0·01 3·55 ± 0·83 0·44 ± 0·01 12·42 ± 1·23***
IL‐10 positive cells
Germ‐free E. coli monoassociated for 4 days
Percent of subset in MLN Percent IL‐10 positive of subsetc Percent of subset in MLN Percent IL‐10 positive of subset
CD4 32·8 ± 1·6 0·17 ± 0·04 31·5 ± 1·9 0·25 ± 0·04
CD19 37·5 ± 2·0 1·40 ± 0·05 43·5 ± 1·7 1·43 ± 0·07
a

Values represent mean ± SEM of cells expressing the indicated cell surface marker evaluated after overnight stimulation with E. coli NC101 lysate followed by 5 hr incubation with ionomycin plus PMA, with Golgi stop during the last 4 hr. MLN from E. coli NC101 monoassociated mice n = 4; MLN from GF mice n = 6.

b

Values represent mean ± SEM of the proportion of IFN‐γ positive cells determined after gating on each subset.

c

Values represent mean ± SEM of the proportion of IL‐10 positive cells determined after gating on each subset.

**< 0·01 compared to dual CD4 positive – IFN‐γ positive cells in MLN of GF mice; ***< 0·001 compared to dual NKp46 positive – IFN‐γ positive cells in MLN of GF mice. Otherwise differences between percent of cytokine positive cells of each subset from E. coli monoassociated and GF mice are not statistically significant.