Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 20;6:28268. doi: 10.1038/srep28268

Table 2. Structure prediction results of 4z39_A (left) and 5esw_B (right) targets.

Method Resp. time Cov % Rmsd Å TM-Score Method Resp. time Cov % Rmsd Å TM-Score
Robetta 20:02:31 100 5.23 0.66 ORION 00:31:52 100 3.37 0.88
ORION 00:22:02 100 5.48 0.64 Robetta 16:36:12 95 3.57 0.87
SPARKS-X 01:44:23 100 4.39 0.62 RaptorX 12:29:01 100 3.68 0.86
IntFOLD2-TS 00:39:38 100 5.68 0.61 Princeton_TEMPLATE 01:03:10 100 3.62 0.85
IntFOLD3-TS 17:11:36 100 5.98 0.61 RBO Aleph 04:22:19 100 5.93 0.85
Phyre2 01:17:32 95 4.17 0.60 SPARKS-X 01:21:07 100 5.31 0.85
RaptorX 03:23:19 100 5.65 0.60 IntFOLD3-TS 04:46:19 100 4.81 0.84
HHpred* 00:03:27 100 7.73 0.59 SWISS-MODEL 00:14:13 89 2.12 0.84
Princeton_TEMPLATE 03:38:25 100 5.75 0.59 IntFOLD2-TS 05:49:21 100 5.19 0.83
RBO Aleph 02:08:36 100 6.18 0.58 HHpred* 00:02:11 100 5.19 0,82
SWISS-MODEL 00:02:32 88 6.41 0.45 Phyre2 00:41:13 93 4.73 0.81
NaiveBLAST 00:00:18 32 2.67 0.25 NaiveBLAST 00:00:01 83 5.69 0.73

ORION webserver predictions results were compared to 11 servers in CAMEO. Results of the 11 servers were taken from the CAMEO server. The table describes the response time (Resp. time) in hours:minutes:seconds, the percentage of coverage of the model and target (cov), the RMSD value between the model and the target (in Å) and the TM-score for the 12 servers compared. The ORION server is in bold and stars ‘*’ indicate that the model is obtained manually from the considered webserver.