Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 20;6:28268. doi: 10.1038/srep28268

Table 3. Structure prediction results of 2mu4_A (left) and 4uht_B (right) targets.

Method Resp. Time Cov % Rmsd Å TM-Score Method Resp. Times Cov % Rmsd Å TM-Score
Robetta 22:17:39 94 5.66 0.61 RBO Aleph 02:39:54 100 3.13 0.87
ORION 00:21:32 97 5.03 0.55 Robetta 06:00:50 100 2.18 0.85
SPARKS-X* 00:23:21 100 6.18 0.55 RaptorX 12:18:38 100 3.02 0.84
RaptorX 22:42:28 100 6.29 0.51 SPARKS-X 00:26:43 100 3.24 0.82
Princeton_TEMPLATE 02:54:36 100 8.41 0.50 HHpred* 00:08:12 100 3.15 0.82
RBO Aleph 00:05:45 100 15.55 0.44 ORION 00:24:01 100 3.05 0.81
IntFOLD2-TS 19:31:46 100 13.35 0.31 IntFOLD3-TS 17:13:54 100 3.28 0.81
HhpredB 00:02:39 100 12.97 0.30 IntFOLD2-TS 13:51:57 100 3.21 0.80
IntFOLD3-TS 01:40:45 100 21.90 0.22 Princeton_TEMPLATE 03:00:45 100 3.10 0.80
NaiveBLAST 00:00:28 60 15.86 0.19 SWISS-MODEL 00:02:51 96 3.22 0.80
Phyre2 00:09:40 15 3.66 0.13 NaiveBLAST 03:22:18 96 2.78 0.78
SWISS-MODEL 00:01:40 63 14.85 0.13 Phyre2 00:28:51 97 5.17 0.71

ORION webserver predictions results were compared to 11 servers in CAMEO. Results of the 11 servers were taken from the CAMEO server. The table describes the response time (Resp. time) in hours:minutes:seconds, the percentage of coverage of the model and target (cov), the RMSD value between the model and the target in Ångströms and the TM-score for the 12 servers compared. The ORION server is in bold and stars ‘*’ indicate that the model is obtained manually from the considered webserver.