Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Health. 2016 Jan 29;64(4):319–328. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2016.1138478

Table 3.

Bivariate tests of association and multiple linear regression modeling the association of tobacco product social norms with demographic and personal characteristics.

Potential predictor Cigarettes (n=484)
E-cigarettes (n=476)
Hookah (n=486)
Bivariate test statistic (p) Regression parameter estimate (p) Bivariate test statistic (p) Regression parameter estimate (p) Bivariate test statistic (p) Regression parameter estimate (p)
Male 6.45 (<.001) 1.19 (<.001) 3.09 (.002) 0.57 (.030) 1.86 (.064) 0.19 (.47)
White/non-Hispanic 0.06 (.95) 0.06 (.80) 1.26 (.21) 0.41 (.16) 1.04 (.30) 0.35 (.24)
Lower undergraduates −1.07 (.28) −0.15 (.57) −2.74 (.006) −0.48 (.14) −1.38 (.17) <0.01 (.99)
On-campus residence −0.65 (.52) 0.05 (.82) −2.20 (.028) −0.14 (.58) −2.67 (.008) −0.37 (.15)
Current tobacco user 6.37 (<.001) 1.55 (<.001) 7.74 (<.001) 1.97(<.001) 9.22 (<.001) 2.18 (<.001)
Number of smokers in lifer 0.20 (<.001) 0.21 (.036) 0.26 (<.001) 0.36 (.005) 0.20 (<.001) 0.27 (.038)
Reported exposure to SHSr 0.03 (.53) −0.01 (.84) 0.17 (<.001) 0.12 (.033) 0.10 (.022) 0.04 (.47)
MLR F=14.16, p < .001
R2=0.17
MLR F=13.46, p<.001
R2=0.17
MLR F=10.67, p<.001
R2=0.14

SHS=Secondhand smoke

MLR=multiple linear regression

Note. All bivariate comparisons based on two-sample t-tests except those denoted with ‘r,’ which are Pearson's product moment correlations.