Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Health. 2016 Jan 29;64(4):319–328. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2016.1138478

Table 4.

Bivariate tests of association and multiple linear regression modeling the association of perception of percentage of peers using tobacco products with demographic and personal characteristics.

Potential predictor Cigarettes (n=486)
E-cigarettes (n=484)
Hookah (n=488)
Bivariate test statistic (p) Regression parameter estimate (p) Bivariate test statistic (p) Regression parameter estimate (p) Bivariate test statistic (p) Regression parameter estimate (p)
Male −3.01 (.003) −5.85 (.001) −2.15 (.032) −3.54 (.037) −6.10 (<.001) −12.84 (<.001)
White/non-Hispanic −3.03 (.001) −6.53 (.001) −3.60 (<.001) −8.49 (<.001) −3.44 (<.001) −8.11 (.001)
Lower undergraduates −1.12 (.16) −1.31 (.54) 1.26 (.21) 2.67 (.20) 1.71(.089) 4.46 (.098)
On-campus residence −1.54 (.12) −1.07 (.53) −0.26 (.80) −0.75 (.65) 0.27 (.79) 0.34 (.87)
Current tobacco user 2.36 (.009) 2.84 (.20) 0.76 (.44) 1.91 (.37) 0.52 (.61) −3.10 (.25)
Number of smokers in lifer 0.21 (<.001) 3.15 (<.001) 0.04 (.34) 0.55 (.51) 0.09 (.058) 2.71 (.011)
Reported exposure to SHSr 0.18 (<.001) 0.98 (.011) 0.06 (.21) 0.35 (.34) 0.13 (.003) 1.01 (.035)
MLR F=8.32, p<.001
R2 = 0.11
MLR F=4.14, p<.001
R2=0.06
MLR F=9.22, p<.001
R2=0.12

SHS=Secondhand smoke

MLR=multiple linear regression

Note. All bivariate comparisons based on two-sample t-tests except those denoted with ‘r,’ which are Pearson's product moment correlations.