Table 2.
Study 1 | Study 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROI pairs | t-stats (ASD–TD) | p | ROI pairs | t-stats (ASD–TD) | p |
iFC | iFC | ||||
PCC–R Hipp | −2.1 | 0.03 | L LP–R Hipp | −2.3 | 0.02 |
L LP–mPFC | −1.99 | 0.04 | PCC–mPFC | −2.3 | 0.03 |
PCC–mPFC | −2.5 | 0.01 | Prg ACC–R Hipp | −2.5 | 0.01 |
Prg ACC–PCC | −2.5 | 0.01 | Prg ACC–L Hipp | −2.3 | 0.02 |
R Amyg–L LP | −2.0 | 0.04 | Prg ACC–mPFC | −2.0 | 0.04 |
R Amyg–R Ins | −2.0 | 0.04 | L Amyg–PCC | −2.0 | 0.04 |
L Amyg–L LP | −2.3 | 0.02 | |||
L Thal–R Thal | −2.4 | 0.01 | |||
SD-iFC | SD-iFC | ||||
PCC–mPFC | 2.3 | 0.01 | PCC–mPFC | 2.8 | 0.005 |
L LP–mPFC | 2.0 | 0.04 | L LP–L Ins | −2.8 | 0.006 |
L LP–R Thal | −2.4 | 0.01 | PCC–L Thal | −2.1 | 0.03 |
L Thal–R Thal | 2.0 | 0.04 |
Hipp, hippocampal formation; iFC, intrinsic functional connectivity; LP, lateral parietal cortex; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; ROI, regions of interest.