Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 1;6(5):403–414. doi: 10.1089/brain.2015.0389

Table 2.

ROI Pairs with Significant Difference in iFC (Upper Section) and SD-iFC (Lower Section) for Study 1 on the Left and Study 2 on the Right

Study 1 Study 2
ROI pairs t-stats (ASD–TD) p ROI pairs t-stats (ASD–TD) p
iFC iFC
PCC–R Hipp −2.1 0.03 L LP–R Hipp −2.3 0.02
L LP–mPFC −1.99 0.04 PCC–mPFC −2.3 0.03
PCC–mPFC −2.5 0.01 Prg ACC–R Hipp −2.5 0.01
Prg ACC–PCC −2.5 0.01 Prg ACC–L Hipp −2.3 0.02
R Amyg–L LP −2.0 0.04 Prg ACC–mPFC −2.0 0.04
R Amyg–R Ins −2.0 0.04 L Amyg–PCC −2.0 0.04
L Amyg–L LP −2.3 0.02      
L Thal–R Thal −2.4 0.01      
SD-iFC SD-iFC
PCC–mPFC 2.3 0.01 PCC–mPFC 2.8 0.005
L LP–mPFC 2.0 0.04 L LP–L Ins −2.8 0.006
L LP–R Thal −2.4 0.01 PCC–L Thal −2.1 0.03
L Thal–R Thal 2.0 0.04      

Hipp, hippocampal formation; iFC, intrinsic functional connectivity; LP, lateral parietal cortex; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; ROI, regions of interest.