Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 5;30(2):627–635. doi: 10.1111/jvim.13913

Table 7.

P values when QST outcomes were compared among clinical grades of affected dogs and normal dogs

Modality Grade Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5
Cold (latency) Normal <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001
2 1.0000 <.0001 .003
3 .0006 .015
4 .97
Cold (response rate) Normal .0003 .0003 .0003 .0003
2 .78 .0003 .0003
3 .0003 .0003
4 .53
Heat (latency) Normal <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001
2 1.0000 .03 .56
3 .11 .83
4 .89
Heat (response rate) Normal .0007 .0007 .0007 .0007
2 1.00 .01 .03
3 .02 .04
4 .26
Mechanical (force) Normal <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001
2 1.00 .95 <.0001
3 1.00 <.0001
4 <.0001
Mechanical (response rate) Normal .16 .47 .10 .0007
2 .55 .85 .0007
3 .55 .0007
4 .0007

QST, quantitative sensory testing. P values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Sidak method.