Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 17;30(1):276–281. doi: 10.1111/jvim.13808

Table 2.

Comparison of the ability of laboratory methods to detect positive Streptococcus equi field samples compared to the direct‐PCR (gold standard)

Laboratory Method Number Positive False Positives Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) CC (%) OR 95% CI P Value
Direct PCR (gold standard) 35 Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
Flocked swab PCR 24 0 69 100 100 100 94 1 NA .001b
Flocked swab culture 13 3a 37 98 81 88 87 30.5 8.6–108.8 <.001
Traditional culture 14 2a 40 99 88 88 88 52 10.8–250.2 <.001

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CC, correctly classified; Ref, referent; NA, not available.

a

Two of these three values represent the same samples.

b

Fisher's exact test, P value for logistic regression model not calculable.