Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;39(6):531–541. doi: 10.1111/pace.12854

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Bar chart (mean ± SD) comparing mean BV AHR resulting from LV coronary sinus (LV‐CS, n = 9), BV coronary sinus (LV‐CS, n = 9), and BV endocardial (BV‐EN, n = 76) pacing. Best BV‐EN significantly improved ventricular AHR over LV‐CS for both ventricles and over BV‐CS for the right ventricle. There was no statistical difference between LV‐CS and BV‐CS for either ventricle, nor was there a statistical difference between CS pacing and the average BV‐EN AHR for either ventricle. * denotes statistically significant. SD = standard deviation. Other abbreviations as in previous figures.