Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;39(6):531–541. doi: 10.1111/pace.12854

Table II.

Correlation between RV and LV AHR

LV AHR(%) RV AHR(%) Correlations
ID Maximum Average Maximum Average rP rS
1 3.9 −1.0 ± 3.7 15.3 4.2 ± 7.2 0.56 0.54
2 61 19.5 ± 18.9 24.1 1.3 ± 14.4 0.79 0.72
3 34.2 10.3 ± 9.6 51.7 9.7 ± 23.6 −0.04 −0.14
4 14.3 5.1 ± 4.3 57.5 24.3 ± 24.9 0.08 0.05
5 13.8 6.2 ± 3.9 65.1 32.8 ± 24.0 −0.19 0.19
6 25.6 17.6 ± 7.5 6 −10.9 ± 10.9 −0.41 −0.25
7 7.6 0.3 ± 5.7 18.9 6.8 ± 9.1 0.40 0.37
8 21.4 0.2 ± 8.9 101 25.0 ± 35.5 0.77 0.76
9 25 12.4 ± 11.1 9.9 4.1 ± 5.7 0.91 1.00
All 61 7.6 ± 11.7 101 10.6 ± 24.4 0.00 −0.06

Comparison of interventricular sensitivity of AHR across all pacing protocols (BV‐CS, LV‐CS, and BV‐EN). Individual and whole‐cohort maximum and averaged AHR (mean ± SD) were calculated for both ventricles.

AHR = acute hemodynamic response; ID = anonymized patient number; rP = Pearson's correlation coefficient; rS = Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. SD = standard deviation. Other abbreviations as in previous tables.