Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 23;37(1):230–253. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23023

Table 4.

Associations between significant clusters and functional measures

Auditory LI PTAuditory LI IPL LI
ADI‐A r = 0.253, P = 0.021* r = 0.249, P = 0.023*
ADI‐B r = 0.118, P = 0.174 r = 0.145, P = 0.125
ADOS‐A r = 0.165, P = 0.096 r = 0.200, P = 0.057
ADOS‐B r = 0.130, P = 0.153 r = 0.143, P = 0.129
NWR r = −0.059, P = 0.325 r = −0.002, P = 0.494
FAS r = −0.098, P = 0.222 r = −0.065, P = 0.306
EFT r = 0.038, P = 0.385

Correlation between the Auditory LI and its conjunction with the PT (PTAuditory LI) with measures of social communication (ADI‐A, ADI‐B, ADOS‐A, ADOS‐B, NWR, FAS) and the IPL LI with a visuospatial task (EFT).