Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 25;7(11):12997–13012. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7016

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with OS and TTR of HCC (n = 374).

Variable OS TTR
HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
Univariate analysis
 OPN (High vs. Low) 1.54 1.16–2.06 0.003 1.51 1.12–2.03 0.007
 Vimentin (High vs. Low) 1.40 1.05–1.87 0.021 1.58 1.18–2.13 0.002
 Sex (female vs. male) 1.04 0.72–1.50 0.848 1.08 0.73–1.59 0.710
 Age, years (> 50 vs. ≤ 50) 1.19 0.90–1.59 0.226 1.09 0.81–1.46 0.563
 ALT (> 75 vs. ≤ 75 U/L) 1.20 0.77–1.85 0.418 1.00 0.62–1.61 0.993
 AFP, ng/mL (> 20 vs. ≤ 20) 1.60 1.18–2.18 0.003 1.41 1.03–1.91 0.030
 Liver cirrhosis (yes vs. no) 1.33 0.81–2.19 0.263 1.48 0.88–2.47 0.138
 HBsAg (positive vs. negative) 1.61 0.85–3.05 0.142 3.42 1.41–8.32 0.007
 Tumor size, cm (> 5 vs. ≤ 5) 1.63 1.18–2.26 0.003 1.49 1.06–2.11 0.023
 Tumor number (multiple vs. single) 1.98 1.13–3.49 0.017 1.26 0.64–2.47 0.500
 Tumor capsule (none vs. complete) 1.41 1.06–1.88 0.017 1.32 0.99–1.77 0.062
 Vascular invasion (yes vs. no) 1.99 1.49–2.67 < 0.001 1.65 1.21–2.26 0.002
 BCLC stage (B and C vs. 0 and A) 1.81 1.27–2.58 0.001 1.47 1.04–2.07 0.029
 Tumor differentiation (III∼IV vs. I∼II) 1.54 1.12–2.10 0.007 1.42 1.02–1.97 0.038
 Combination of OPN and vimentin 0.005 0.002
  II vs. I 1.30 0.87–1.95 0.182 1.15 0.75–1.77 0.514
  III vs. I 1.08 0.69–1.68 0.572 1.06 0.68–1.67 0.789
  IV vs. I 1.86 1.29–2.68 0.001 1.94 1.33–2.83 0.001
Multivariate analysisa
 OPN (High vs. Low) 1.42 1.05–1.93 0.023 1.39 1.02–1.90 0.037
 Vimentin (High vs. Low) 1.29 0.95–1.73 0.101 1.51 1.11–2.05 0.010
 AFP, ng/mL (> 20 vs. ≤ 20) 1.39 1.01–1.92 0.042 1.22 0.89–1.69 0.216
 Tumor size, cm (> 5 vs. ≤ 5) 1.43 1.01–2.03 0.042 1.37 0.95–1.99 0.093
 Vascular invasion (yes vs. no) 1.52 1.09–2.11 0.013 1.39 0.98–1.98 0.067
 BCLC stage (B and C vs. 0 and A) 1.41 0.94–2.12 0.097 1.24 0.84–1.84 0.282
 Tumor differentiation (III∼IV vs. I∼II) 1.15 0.82–1.60 0.422 1.05 0.74–1.50 0.781
Multivariate analysisb
 AFP, ng/mL (> 20 vs. ≤ 20) 1.40 1.02–1.93 0.036 1.25 0.91–1.72 0.177
 Tumor size, cm (> 5 vs. ≤ 5) 1.42 1.00–2.01 0.049 1.34 0.93–1.95 0.121
 Vascular invasion (yes vs. no) 1.51 1.09–2.11 0.014 1.39 0.97–1.97 0.070
 BCLC stage (B and C vs. 0 and A) 1.41 0.94–2.12 0.101 1.23 0.83–1.82 0.313
 Tumor differentiation (III∼IV vs. I∼II) 1.14 0.82–1.60 0.435 1.05 0.74–1.50 0.794
 Combination of OPN and vimentin 0.029 0.007
  II vs. I 1.36 0.90–2.05 0.148 1.18 0.77–1.82 0.448
  III vs. I 1.15 0.73–1.80 0.545 1.11 0.70–1.76 0.655
  IV vs. I 1.78 1.20–2.63 0.004 1.91 1.28–2.85 0.002

Univariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression; Multivariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression; Variables were adopted in multivariate analysis for their prognostic significance by univariate analysis.

A “low” versus “high” OPN and vimentin expression was defined according to the cut-off values of OPN and vimentin level which were defined as the median of the cohort.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; TTR, time to recurrence.

I, Low-OPN and Low-vimentin; II, high-OPN and low-vimentin; III, low-OPN and high-vimentin; IV, High-OPN and High-vimentin.

a

Multivariate analysis of OPN, vimentin, AFP, Tumor size, Vascular invasion, BCLC stage and Tumor differentiation.

b

Multivariate analysis of Combination OPN and vimentin, AFP, Tumor size, Vascular invasion, BCLC stage and Tumor differentiation.