Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 28;38(2):129–139. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv009

Table 3.

Meta-analysis data for the stability of Herbst appliance Tx derived from 19 studies. The weighted data (weighted according to the number of patients of each individual study) for ANB angle, Wits appraisal, sagittal molar relationship [data from studies using millimetres and cusp widths (cw) shown separately], soft-tissue profile convexity excluding nose, overjet, and overbite are shown. The references, total number of patients, weighted mean pre-Tx age, Tx changes, duration of post-Tx observation period (months), post-Tx changes as well as final values are shown.

Variable References Number of patients Pre-Tx age (weighted) Tx changes* (weighted) Duration of post-Tx observation period in months (weighted) Post-Tx relapse* (weighted) Final value (weighted)
n mean (years) mean mean min max mean min max mean
ANB angle (n = 12) (44,47,48,49,51,54,55,56, 57,60,61,63) 254 15.0 −1.5° 34.0 12 78 0.2° −0.8° 0.8° 4.1°
Wits appraisal (n = 6) (47,48,51,60,61,62) 143 16.0 −2.6 mm 24.2 12 36 0.5 mm 0.1 mm 1.8 mm 0.1 mm
Sagittal molar relationship (n = 12) (44,45,46,47,48,50,51,57, 59,60,61,63) 310 15.7 −5.1mm, −0.8 cw 49.7 12 382 1.2mm, 0.1 cw 0.1mm, 0.0 cw 2.4mm, 0.2 cw −2.0 mm**, 0.1 cw***
Soft-tissue profile convexity (n = 4)
Class II:1 (44,47,58,63) 120 14.4 −3.2° 56.5 12 74 0.0° −0.8° 0.6° 160.6°
Overjet (n = 11)
Class II:1 (44,45,47,50,53,55,57,59,60,61,63) 266 14.4 −6.5 mm 63.1 12 382 1.8 mm 0.0 mm 3.4 mm 3.8 mm
Overbite (n = 8)
Class II:1 (47,50,53,55,57,59,61,63) 178 14.9 −2.9 mm 81.4 12 382 1.4 mm −0.7 mm 2.3 mm 3.7 mm
Overbite (n = 4)
Class II:2 (46,48,49,62) 109 16.0 −4.4 mm 26.3 12 34 1.0 mm 0.9 mm 1.2 mm 2.8 mm

*Negative Tx and post-Tx changes mean favourable development regarding Class II correction (=no relapse).

**0.0mm means edge-to-edge Class II relationship (=0.5 cw).

***0.0 cw means Class I relationship.