Table 2.
Novel SHELL alleles.
| Potential dura contaminantsa | shMPOB2 | shMPOB3 | shMPOB4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region 1 | 110 | 1 (0.1%)b | 24 (2.1%) | 1 (0.1%) |
| Region 2 | 126 | – | 16 (1.4%) | – |
| Region 3 | 32 | – | 5 (0.6%) | 1 (0.1%) |
| Region 4 | 36 | – | 11 (1.0%) | – |
| Region 5 | 37 | 1 (0.2%) | – | – |
| Region 6 | 114 | 18 (3.2%) | – | – |
| Region 7 | 129 | 12 (2.1%) | 2 (0.3%) | – |
| Region 8 | 89 | 5 (0.9%) | – | – |
| Region 9 | 20 | – | – | – |
| Region 10 | 145 | 59 (6.4%) | 11 (1.2%) | – |
| Region 11 | 199 | 52 (4.7%) | 16 (1.4%) | – |
| Region 12 | 65 | – | – | – |
| Region 13 | 30 | – | – | – |
| Total | 1,132 | 148 (1.4%) | 85 (0.8%) | 2 (0.02%) |
aNumber of palms genotyped as wild-type at both the shAVROS and shMPOB variant nucleotide positions.
bInteger value represents number of palms per site heterozygous for the indicated nucleotide variant, and parentheses denote the percentage of the indicated heterozygous palms among all palms analyzed per site.