Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 1;38(3):237–250. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv048

Table 5.

Summary of studies characteristics and results of the included studies assessing PBB.

Reference Sample Outcomesa Results
Baseline G1 ΔG1b Baseline G2 ΔG2b ΔG1 − ΔG2 P-valuec
Group 1 Group 2 Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Işcan and Sarisoy (40) Passive PBB 5 mm Passive PBB 10 mm
n = 13 n = 12 Overbite (mm) −2.3 (1.1) 2.7 (1.2) −2.6 (1.6) 2.5 (1.0) 0.2 NS
9♀/4♂ 9♀/3♂ SN.GoGn (°) 41.5 (3.7) 0.7 (1.1) 42.7 (3.3) 1.2 (1.2) 0.5 NS
10.4±1.2 yrs 10.9±1.8 yrs SN.PP (°) 7.5 (2.6) −0.3 (1.1) 8.7 (2.6) −0.1 (0.8) −0.2 NS
OP: 4–10 months OP: 4–13 months
Işcan and Sarisoy (40) Passive PBB 5 mm Untreated Overbite (mm) −2.3 (1.1) 2.7 (1.2) −1.6 (0.9) 0.2 (0.5) 2.5 P < 0.01
n = 13 n = 14 SN.GoGn (°) 41.5 (3.7) 0.7 (1.1) 41.4 (4.0) 0.0 (0.9) −0.7 NS
9♀/4♂ 11♀/3♂ SN.PP 2 (°) 7.5 (2.6) −0.3 (1.1) 10.3 (2.9) 0.0 (1.7) −0.3 NS
10.4±1.2 yrs 10.6±1.4 yrs
OP: 4–10 months OP: 7–9 months
Işcan and Sarisoy (40) Passive PBB 10 mm Untreated Overbite (mm) −2.6 (1.6) 2.5 (1.0) −1.6 (0.9) 0.2 (0.5) 2.3 P < 0.01
n = 12 n = 14 SN.GoGn (°) 42.7 (3.3) 1.2 (1.2) 41.4 (4.0) 0.0 (0.9) −1.2 P < 0.05
9♀/3♂ 11♀/3♂ SN.PP 2 (°) 8.7 (2.6) −0.1 (0.8) 10.3 (2.9) 0.0 (1.7) −0.1 NS
10.9±1.8 yrs 10.6±1.4 yrs
OP: 4–13 months OP: 7–9 months
Bazzucchi et al. (41) Magnetic PBB Untreated Overbite 2 (mm) −2.2 (1.6) 2.4 (1.8) 3.4 (2.7) 0.9 (1.8) 1.5 NS
n = 29 n = 29 MPA (°) 37.1 (5.1) 0.8 (1.3) 34 (4.3) 0.2 (1.0) 1.0 NS
23♀/6♂ 23♀/6♂
11.0±3.0 yrs 11.0±3.0 yrs
OP: 8 months OP: 9 months
Barbre and Sinclair (32) Magnetic PBB Untreated Overbite (mm) −3.0 (1.6) 3.2 (1.4) NA NA NA NA
n = 25 n = 25 MPA (°) 29.8 (4.8) 1.0 (2.0) 28.6 (0.9) 0.6 (0.8) −0.4 NS
10.6 Matched SN.MP 1 (°) 38.4 (5.6) 1.0 (1.4) 34.4 (0.6) 0.2 (0.3) −0.8 P < 0.05
(8.2–13.4) yrs SN.PP 2 (°) 3.5 (2.7) 0.1 (1.3) 7.4 (0.6) 0.2 (0.3) −0.3 NS
OP: 7 months
Kiliaridis et al. (31) Magnetic PBB Passive PBB 5 mm Overbite (mm) −1.9 (0.8) 2.4 (1.3) −3.4 (1.9) 2.2 (0.7) 0.2 NS
n = 10 n = 10 SN.MP (°) 39.7 (3.7) 0.8 (0.5) 40.3 (5.1) 1.0 (0.7) 0.2 NS
7♀/3♂ 7♀/3♂ PP.MP (°) 32.7 (4.4) 1.1 (0.8) 33.6 (4.2) 1.3 (1.0) 0.2 NS
12.6±2.6 yrs 11.9±2.7 yrs
OP: 5 months OP: 6 months
Işcan et al. (34) Spring PBB Passive (3–4) mm PBB + VPCC Overbite (mm) −2.9 (1.3) 3.5 (0.4) −2.9 (1.9) 4.5 (0.6) 1.0 NS
n = 11 n = 12 SN.GoGn (°) 41.3 (3.9) 1.6 (0.4) 42.3 (3.8) 2.0 (0.4) 0.4 NS
10.3 9.8 SN.PP (°) 10.4 (3.2) 0.4 (0.4) 8.5 (2.2) 0.1 (0.3) 0.3 NS
(8.6–13.5) yrs (7.3–11.6) yrs PP.MP (°) 33.0 (5.1) 1.9 (0.5) 36.3 (4.6) 1.7 (0.4) −0.2 NS
OP: 20 months
Doshi and Bhad-Patil (21) Spring PBB Magnetic PBB Overbite (mm) NA 3.4 (1.2) NA 4.9 (1.4) −1.5 P < 0.05
n = 10 n = 10 SN.GoGn (°) 1.8 (0.8) 1.9 (1.2) 0.1 NS
OP: 8 months
Kuster and Ingervall (35) Spring PBB Magnetic PBB Overbite (mm) −0.5 (−) 1.3 (−) −2.0 (−) 3.0 (−) −1.7 NA
n = 22 n = 11 SN.MP (°) 42.1 (−) 0.2 (−) 37.1 (−) 1.1 (−) 1.3
11♀/11♂ 7♀/4♂ NSGn (°) 72.6 (−) 0.3 (−) 71.0 (−) 1.0 (−) 0.7
9.3 yrs. 10.7 yrs. SN.PP (°) 6.7 (−) −0.1 (−) 6.2 (−) −0.4 (−) 0.3
OP: 12 months OP: 3 months PP.MP (°) 34.7 (−) 0.4 (−) 31.1 (−) −0.6 (−) 1.0
Albogha et al. (25) Magnetic PBB RMI + PBB Overbite (mm) −3.9 (1.6) 3.3 (1.3) −3.8 (1.9) 3.1 (1.4) 0.2 NS
n = 15 n = 15 FMA (°) 32.8 (5.8) 0.2 (2.5) 33.9 (5.2) 0.4 (2.5) 0.2 NS
9♀/6♂ 11♀/4♂ SN.MP (°) 42.8 (3.5) 1.4 (1.2) 43.7 (5.4) 1.1 (2.1) −0.3 NS
11.2±1.6 yrs 10.9±1.8 yrs NSPog (°) 74.9 (2.8) 0.2 (0.9) 73.2 (3.2) 0.4 (1.0) −0.2 NS
OP: 4 months PP.MP (°) 33.8 (5.3) 0.8 (1.2) 35.5 (5.1) 0.4 (2.8) −1.2 NS
BaN.PtGn (°) 83.9 (3.0) 1.6 (1.4) 83.1 (4.7) 1.7 (2.0) −0.1 NS

SD, standard-deviation; ♀, female; ♂, male; yrs, years; G1, group 1; G2, group 2; NS, non-significant; OP, observation period; NA, not available; PBB, posterior bite-blocks; ΔG1, difference between final and baseline measurements for group 1; ΔG2, difference between final and baseline measurements for group 2; ΔG1 − ΔG2, difference between changes observed for groups 1 and 2.

aPre-treatment statistically significant (P < 0.05) differences on bold font, and absence of pre-treatment comparison on italic font.

bStatistically significant (P < 0.05) changes on bold font, and absence of intra-group comparison on italic font.

cConcerning ΔG1 − ΔG2.