Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 1;38(3):237–250. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv048

Table 6.

Summary of studies characteristics and results of the included studies assessing MEA and VPCC.

Reference Sample Outcomesa Results
Baseline G1 ΔG1b Baseline G2 ΔG2b ΔG1 − ΔG2 P-valuec
Group 1 Group 2 Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Sankey et al. (42) Splint slow MEA + VPCC + lip seal training Untreated Overbite (mm) 0.6 (3.0) 1.3 (2.0) NA 0.0 (0.2) 1.3 P < 0.001
n = 38 n = 38 MPA (°) 40.0 (3.9) −0.3 (1.7) 40.1 (3.9) 0.2 (2.1) −0.1 NS
24♀/14♂ 24♀/14♂ NSGn (°) 69.8 (3.1) 0.1 (1.5) NA 0.5 (1.2) −0.4 NS
8,.3±1.2 yrs 8.2±1.3 yrs SN.PP (°) 4.1 (3.0) 0.3 (1.9) 0.1 (1.0) 0.2 NS
OP: 15 months -
Bacetti et al. (16) Splint rapid MEA + VPCC Untreated
n = 21 n = 18 Overbite (mm) NA 1.9 (1.9) NA 1.5 (1.9) 0.4 NS
- - MPA (°) −1.2 (2.0) −1.3 (1.9) 0.1 NS
8.6±0.7 yrs 8.4±1.0 yrs FH.PP (°) 0.8 (1.4) 0.4 (2.1) 0.4 NS
OP: 31 months OP: 32 months PP.MP (°) −2.1 (2.6) −1.7 (1.9) −0.4 NS
Pre-pubertal
Bacetti et al. (16) Splint rapid MEA + VPCC Untreated Overbite (mm) NA 1.8 (1.7) NA 0.2 (2.2) 1.6 NS
n = 15 n = 14 MPA (°) −2.9 (2.2) −0.7 (2.2) −2.2 P < 0.05
- - FH.PP (°) −0.3 (1.6) 0.2 (1.7) −0.5 NS
9.3±1.0 yrs 9.8±1.2 yrs PP.MP (°) −2.6 (1.9) −1.1 (2.3) −1.5 NS
OP: 36 months OP: 38 months
Pubertal
Schulz et al. (45) Splint rapid MEA + VPCC Splint rapid MEA Overbite (mm) 2.4 (2.3) 1.6 (2.1) 2.5 (2.3) 0.9 (1.6) 0.7 NS
n = 29 n = 29 MPA (°) 29.3 (3.5) 1.3 (1.5) 29.6 (3.8) 0.3 (1.7) −1.0 NS
16♀/13♂ 16♀/13♂ FH.PP 1 (°) 2.5 (2.6) 1.2 (1.6) 0.4 (2.8) 1.4 (1.3) 0.2 NS
9.1±1.0 yrs 9.0±1.0 yrs
OP: 33 months OP: 46 months

SD, standard-deviation; ♀, female; ♂, male; yrs, years; G1, group 1; G2, group 2; NS, non-significant; OP, observation period; NA, not available; MEA, Maxillary expansion appliances; VPCC, vertical-pull chin cup; ΔG1, difference between final and baseline measurements for group 1; ΔG2, difference between final and baseline measurements for group 2; ΔG1 − ΔG2, difference between changes observed for groups 1 and 2.

aPre-treatment statistically significant (P < 0.05) differences on bold font, and absence of pre-treatment comparison on italic font.

bStatistically significant (P < 0.05) changes on bold font, and absence of intra-group comparison on italic font.

cConcerning ΔG1 − ΔG2.