Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 1;38(3):237–250. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv048

Table 9.

Summary of study characteristics and results of the included study assessing VPCC.

Reference Sample Outcomesa Results
Baseline G1 ΔG1b Baseline G2 ΔG2b ΔG1 − ΔG2 P-valuec
Group 1 Group 2 Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Işcan et al. (43)
VPCC Untreated Overbite (mm) −2.9 (2.3) 3.9 (1.4) −2.2 (2.2) 0.4 (−) 3.5 P < 0.01
n = 18 n = 17 SN.GoGn (°) 41.1 (3.5) 1.4 (1.6) 41.2 (3.7) −0.1 (−) −1.3 P < 0.05
12♀/6♂ 11♀/6♂ SN.PP (°) NA 0.6 (1.8) NA 0.2 (−) 0.4 NS
9.4±0.9 yrs 10.8±1.3 yrs
OP: 6–12 months OP: 7–12 months

SD, standard-deviation; ♀, female; ♂, male; yrs, years; G1, group 1; G2, group 2; NS, non-significant; OP, observation period; NA, not available; VPCC, vertical-pull chin cup; ΔG1, difference between final and baseline measurements for group 1; ΔG2, difference between final and baseline measurements for group 2; ΔG1 − ΔG2, difference between changes observed for groups 1 and 2.

aPre-treatment statistically significant (P < 0.05) differences on bold font, and absence of pre-treatment comparison on italic font.

bStatistically significant (P < 0.05) changes on bold font, and absence of intra-group comparison on italic font.

cConcerning ΔG1 − ΔG2.