Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2016 Mar 7;23(2):109–115. doi: 10.3109/09286586.2015.1099682

Table 2.

Innovative Network for Sight Research Diabetic Eye Screening Study image grade, description, and recommendations based on the National Health System Grading Classification System and American Academy of Ophthalmology Recommendations, United States.

Grade Description Recommendation
R0 No DR Re-evaluate in 12 months with either eye care specialist or photographic screening
None
Isolated cotton wools spots (≥1) in the absence of any microaneurysm or hemorrhage
R1 Background DR Refer to eye care provider
≥1 microaneurysm(s)
≥1 retinal hemorrhage(s)
Any exudates caused by DR
R2 Pre-proliferative DR Refer to ophthalmologist promptly
Intra-retinal microvascular abnormality
Venous beading
Venous loop or reduplication
Multiple deep, round or blot hemorrhages
R3 Proliferative DR Refer to ophthalmologist promptly
New vessels on the disc
New vessels elsewhere
Pre-retinal or vitreous hemorrhage
Pre-retinal fibrosis with or without tractional retinal detachment due to DR
M Maculopathy Refer to ophthalmologist promptly
Exudate within 1DD of the center of the fovea
Circinate or group of exudates within the macula
Any microaneurysm or hemorrhage within 1DD of the center of the fovea only if associated with a best visual acuity 20/40 or worse
P Photocoagulation Refer to eye care provider
Focal/grid to macula
Peripheral scatter
U Unclassifiable/ungradable Refer to eye care provider
Due to poor photographic location, focus, or contrast

DR, diabetic retinopathy; DD, disc diameter.