Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: Breast J. 2016 Feb 4;22(3):264–273. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12569

Table 3.

Studies Comparing CTAC- and MRAC-Derived Standardized Uptake Values in Normal Structures

Drzezga (8) Heusch (28) Kershah (27) Pace (9) Current study
Primary malignancy Various Various Various Breast Breast
Number of patients 32 25 40 36 35
Injection-PET/CT interval (mean ± SD) 86 ± 8 min 60 min 66 ± 7 min 60 ± 10 min 60 ± 14 min
PET accumulation time per station (PET/CT) 2 min 2 min 1.5–2 min 1.5 min 2 min
PET/MRI manufacturer Siemens Siemens Philips Siemens Siemens
Injection-PET/MRI interval (mean ± SD) 140 ± 24 min 152 ± 42 min 117 ± 15 min 148 ± 22 min 167 ± 36 min
PET accumulation time per station (PET/MRI) 4 min 8 min 2–2.5 min 4 min 6 min
MRAC segmentation classes 4 4 3 4 4
SUV relationships*,
Blood pool
 Correlation NE Weak Moderate NE Weak
 Difference NE MRAC<CTAC MRAC<CTAC NE MRAC<CTAC
Bone
 Correlation Moderate (mean) Moderate Strong NE Moderate
 Difference MRAC<CTAC MRAC<CTAC (max) MRAC>CTAC NE MRAC<CTAC
Lung
 Correlation Moderate (mean) Weak Strong (max) Moderate Moderate (mean)
 Difference MRAC<CTAC MRAC<CTAC No difference MRAC<CTAC MRAC<CTAC
Liver
 Correlation Moderate (mean) Strong (mean) Moderate Moderate Moderate (max)
 Difference MRAC<CTAC MRAC<CTAC MRAC<CTAC (mean) MRAC<CTAC MRAC<CTAC
Myocardium
 Correlation NE Strong Strong Strong Strong
 Difference NE MRAC>CTAC (max) MRAC>CTAC MRAC>CTAC MRAC>CTAC
Noncardiac muscle
 Correlation Weak (mean) Moderate (max) Moderate Moderate Moderate (mean)
 Difference MRAC<CTAC MRAC<CTAC MRAC>CTAC (max) MRAC<CTAC No difference
Fat
 Correlation NE Moderate (mean) Moderate NE Weak
 Difference NE MRAC<CTAC No difference NE MRAC<CTAC
*

SUVmax and SUVmean unless indicated.

Correlation ρ> 0.70 was considered strong, 0.30 ≤ ρ≤ 0.70 moderate, and ρ< 0.30 weak.

NE, not evaluated.