Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Apr 16;22(7):1284–1289. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.04.007

Table 3.

Multivariate Analysis: 6/8 and 7/8 HLA-matched transplants

Variables Events/Evaluable Hazard Ratio
(95% confidence interval)
p-value
Overall Mortality*
KIR ligand matched 66/114 1.00
KIR ligand mismatched 51/85 0.95 (0.66 – 1.37) 0.79
Treatment failure**
KIR ligand matched 71/113 1.00
KIR ligand mismatched 52/85 0.87 (0.61 – 1.25) 0.45
Relapse***
KIR ligand matched 45/113 1.00
KIR ligand mismatched 37/85 0.96 (0.61 – 1.51) 0.87
NRM
KIR ligand matched 26/113 1.00
KIR ligand mismatched 15/85 0.69 (0.36 – 1.30) 0.25
Grade 2–4 acute GVHD#
KIR ligand matched 40/114 1.00
KIR ligand mismatched 30/85 0.99 (0.61 – 1.60) 0.97
Chronic GVHD##
KIR ligand matched 15/114 1.00
KIR ligand mismatched 21/85 1.66 (0.85 – 3.24) 0.14
*

Model adjusted for disease status (CR2 vs. CR1 HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.15 – 3.19, p=0.01; relapse vs. CR1 HR 4.82, 95% CI 3.01 – 7.71, p<0.0001)

**

Model adjusted for disease status (CR2 vs. CR1 HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.15 – 3.19, p=0.01; relapse vs. CR1 HR 4.82, 95% CI 3.01 – 7.71, p<0.0001)

***

Model adjusted for disease status (CR2 vs. CR1 HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.40 – 5.58, p=0.004; relapse vs. CR1 HR 10.04, 95% CI 5.31 – 19.00, p<0.0001); sex (male vs. female HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.08 – 2.63, p=0.02)

#

Model adjusted for in vivo T-cell depletion vs. none (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.07 – 3.01, p=0.03); patient age (>16 vs. ≤16 years HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27 – 0.91, p=0.02)

##

Model adjusted for in vivo T-cell depletion vs. none (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.20 – 4.58, p=0.01)