Table 4.
Relative odds that circumcised and uncircumcised men used condoms inconsistently by selected individual characteristics: net effects model
| Characteristic | Circumcised | Not circumcised | ||||
| Odds ratio | 95% CI exp (B) | Odds ratio | 95% CI exp (B) | |||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||
| Age (years) | ||||||
| 30–34 | 0.609 | 0.269 | 1.377 | 1.713* | .373 | 7.860 |
| 35–39 | 0.677 | 0.284 | 1.616 | 3.981** | .882 | 17.978 |
| 40–44 | 1.000 | - | - | 1.000 | - | - |
| Education | ||||||
| None | 0.385 | 0.02 | 7.346 | 1.452 | .091 | 23.245 |
| Primary | 0.671 | 0.264 | 1.705 | 1.363 | .429 | 4.337 |
| Secondary | 0.534* | 0.255 | 1.12 | .842 | .304 | 2.334 |
| Tertiary | 1.000 | - | - | 1.000 | - | - |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Never married | 1.409 | 0.000 | . | 6.915*** | 2.106 | 22.709 |
| Ever married |
1.000 | - | - | 1.000 | - | - |
| Place of residence | ||||||
| City or town | 2.507** | 1.036 | 6.067 | .885 | .293 | 2.680 |
| Urban village | 0.97 | 0.383 | 2.456 | 0.677* | .245 | 1.866 |
| Rural village | 1.000 | - | - | 1.000 | - | - |
| HIV testing | ||||||
| Yes | 0.594 | 0.238 | 1.48 | 0.812 | 0.334 | 1.971 |
| No | 1.000 | - | - | 1.000 | - | - |
| Healthy-looking personcannot have HIVinfection |
||||||
| No | 0.446 | 0.021 | 9.52 | .683 | .089 | 5.237 |
| Yes | 1.000 | - | - | 1.000 | - | - |
| Nothing can be done to prevent HIV infection |
||||||
| Yes | 0.553 | 0.005 | 57.21 | 1.332 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| No | 1.000 | - | - | 1.000 | - | - |
1.000 is the reference category
***
significant at p<0.01
**
significant at p<0.05
*
significant at p<0.1
CI, confidence interval