Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Jan 6;26(5):1131–1140. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00553

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Regions that emerge from the direct comparison status judgment > weight judgment at a threshold of p < .05, corrected. (A) A bilateral cluster in the mPFC (−6, 52, 18). (B) A cluster that extends across the left middle and pSTS (−50, −65, 9). (C) A cluster in the VLPFC (−45, 22, −10). For each participant, the SPM ROI toolbox was used to estimate average signal change for both conditions (status judgment, weight judgment) at these 10 mm ROIs. Signal changes in ROIs were then averaged across participants, and mean signal was plotted. Error bars denote mean standard error exempted of between-subject differences (Cousineau, 2005).