Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 21;11(6):e0157914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157914

Table 4. Results of the bare-bones meta-analysis of the success bootstrapping organized by type of evaluation criterion.

Evaluation criteria k N Δ SDΔ 95% CI 80% CI Q I2(%) τ2 75%
 Subjective 4 76 .03 .00 -.19 - .25 .03 - .03 .60 n.s. 0.00 0.00 520
Publ. bias +2 81 .02 .00 -.16 - .06 .02 - .02 44.41*** 88.7 0.01 > 10,000
 Objective 33 857 .08 .00 .01 - .14 .08 - .08 4.78 n.s. 0.00 0.01 778
Publ. bias +9 1,020 .10 .00 .06 - .12 .10 - .10 216*** 81.1 0.00 639
 Test 15 177 .07 .00 -.08 - .21 .07 - .07 8.68n.s. 0.00 0.00 197
Publ. bias +3 330 -.01 .01 -.12 - .09 -.14 - .11 149.33*** 88.6 0.03 86.14

k = number of judgment tasks;

N = number of success indices;

Δ = the success of bootstrapping (see Eq 2);

SDΔ = standard deviation of true score correlation; 95% CI = confidence interval; 80% CI = 80% credibility interval including lower 10% of the true score and the upper 10% of the true score; 75% = percent variance in observed correlation attributable to all artifacts; Publ. bias = publication bias-corrected estimation by the trim-and-fill method (see [63]); + = the number of missing tasks indicated by the trim-and-fill method.