Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Jul;93(7):692–704. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000868

Table 5.

Comparison of absolute differences between Grand Seiko (GS) measured accommodative optical response (AOR) and predicted AOR from schematic eyes and using individual linear regressions of UBM biometry parameters in young subjects from a prior study.1

Prediction Method and Biometry Parameters Used Absolute Difference between GS Measured AOR and Predicted
AOR (D) in Young Subjects
Mean SD Minimum Maximum
Linear Regression
  ACD 0.62 0.44 0.02 1.87
  LT 0.56 0.46 0.00 2.57
  ALRC 0.74 0.54 0.00 3.08
  PLRC 0.75 0.56 0.01 3.33
  ASL 0.91 0.65 0.00 3.29
Paraxial Schematic Eyes
  All parameters
  nlens = 1.422		 0.50 0.39 0.00 2.13
  All parameters
  nlens = subject’s baseline index		 0.57 0.46 0.00 3.01
  All parameters
  nlens = 1.428		 0.52 0.41 0.00 2.15

ACD: anterior chamber depth; LT: lens thickness; ALRC: anterior lens radius of curvature; PLRC: posterior lens radius of curvature; ASL: anterior segment length; SD: standard deviation; nlens lens equivalent refractive index.