Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Sci. 2015 Dec 21;20(3):10.1111/desc.12380. doi: 10.1111/desc.12380

Table 5.

Post-hoc Analyses: Standardized Parameter Estimates of the Predictive Effects of SES Risks at Different Levels of Temperament

Reading Math
Value SES Risk → Intercept SES Risk → Slope SES Risk → Intercept SES Risk → Slope
Study 1
WRRMP
−1 SD -- .03 -- −.26***
Effortful Control M -- .09** -- −.11
+1 SD -- .16** -- .04

−1 SD −.08 -- −.09 --
Negative Affect M −.12*** -- −.16*** --
+1 SD −.17*** -- −.23*** --

−1 SD -- .13*** -- −.01
Surgency M -- .08* -- −.15*
+1 SD -- .03 -- −.29***

Study 2
SECCYD
−1 SD −.32*** −.04 -- −.04
Effortful Control M −.40*** .10 -- .06
+1 SD −.49*** .24** -- .16*

−1 SD −.37*** -- −.29*** --
Negative Affect M −.43*** -- −.37*** --
+1 SD −.50*** -- −.44*** --

−1 SD -- -- −.48*** .22**
Surgency M -- -- −.38*** .07
+1 SD -- -- −.27*** −.08

Note: −1SD = 1 standard deviation below mean. M = mean. +1SD = 1 standard deviation above mean. “--” = moderation effects not significant and post-hoc analyses not conducted.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001.