Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 22;36(25):6836–6849. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0067-16.2016

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

The changes in OKR kinematic features follow distinct time courses during OKR adaptation. A, Schematic illustration of the training and recording schedule. The OKR to 0.2 s constant-velocity stimulation at 30°/s was measured after every 15 min training session (1–4) as well as before the first training session (pre) and 17 h after the last training session (day 2). The training was by sinusoidal stimulation of 0.5 Hz ± 15.7°/s under the head-fixed condition. B, Average of average eye-position (top) and eye-velocity (bottom) traces of the OKRs evoked by 0.2 s constant-velocity stimulation (30°/s) at different times in the training (n = 7 mice). Traces were shown in the same way as in Figure 3A, B. C–E, Changes of peak eye velocity (C), deceleration τ (D), and rebounding gaze drift (E) over the course of the adaptation training. These kinematic features were measured from the OKRs evoked by 0.2 s constant-velocity stimulation at 30°/s. Graphs are organized in the same way as Figure 3C–F.