Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 8;2016:6134187. doi: 10.1155/2016/6134187

Table 1.

General characteristics in NEC infants with and without bowel perforation.

Perforated NEC group (n = 10) Nonperforated NEC group (n = 47) P
Gestational age (weeks)a 31.52 ± 2.31 33.49 ± 2.57 0.03
Body weight (g)a 1550 ± 550.25 1967.87 ± 518.98 0.03
Maleb 5 (50.00) 30 (63.83) 0.65
SGAb 3 (30.00) 7 (14.80) 0.49
Twin pregnancyb 5 (50.00) 13 (27.60) 0.31
Low Apgar scoreb,c 1 (10.00) 5 (10.60) 1.00
In utero fetal distressb 1 (10.00) 3 (6.30) 0.55
Cesarean sectionb 6 (60.00) 30 (63.80) 1.00
Maternal diseasesb 4 (40.00) 17 (36.1) 1.00
SNAP-IIa 8.38 ± 4.75 8.14 ± 6.83 0.09
SNAPPE-IIa 12.88 ± 9.02 13.05 ± 9.96 0.96

Note: adata were expressed as mean ± SD; bdata were expressed as the number (percentage within the group); cdefined as 5-minute Apgar score <7; P < 0.05 compared to the nonperforated NEC group.

NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; SGA, small for gestational age; SNAP, Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology; SNAPPE-II, SNAP-Perinatal Extension-II.

Among the NEC group with perforation, 4 cases gave up treatment (all the 4 cases died according to our follow-up by telephone call), while in the NEC group without perforation, 9 cases gave up treatment due to economic reasons (6 died and 3 survived).