Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jul;51(1 Suppl 1):S39–S47. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.019

Table 2.

Public Health Domain Scores for Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease Survey (n=39 States)

Public health domain Potential range Actual range Mean Median SD Most commonly reported activities Least commonly reported activities
Data collection and analysis 0–3 0–3 1.3 1 1. 1
  • Collected population level data on demographic characteristics (n=16)

  • Conducted needs assessment (n=13)

  • Analyzed population level data on health status at birth or socioeconomic characteristics (both n=4)

Policy development 0–9 0–8 3.1 3 2. 3
  • Provided expertise on sickle cell disease to other organizations in the state (n=20)

  • Developed/disseminated fact sheets for community orgs (n=18)

  • Presented information to state political leaders at least annually (n=4)

  • Produced a state plan to address needs (n=7)

Quality assurance 0–9 0–8 2.2 2 2. 0
  • Used data to improve quality of services for families (n=18)

  • Monitored private providers or facilities (n=13)

  • Monitored managed care organizations (n=2) or local hospitals (n=5)

Coordination 0–11 0–8 2.9 2 2. 5
  • Coordinated with university-based medical facilities/medical schools (n=28) or community organizations (n=20)

  • Coordinate d with WIC or Head Start (both n=3)

Workforce development 0–8 0–7 2.1 1 2. 1
  • Targeted education to physicians (n=21) or nurses (n=16)

  • Developed education plan for policy makers or birthing facility staff (both n=3)

Access to services 0–10 0–9 3.9 4 2. 4
  • Tracked if children received penicillin prophylaxis (n=27) or kept a visit with hematologist (n=26)

  • Tracked if children received Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (n=5) or parents received education about spleen palpation (n=6)

Total 0–50 0–38 15.6 14 9. 4

WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children