Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 26;45(4):517–522. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw066

Table 2.

Summary of results of survey and comparison of answers between 2006 and 2013 cohorts

Focus of question 2006 cohort n correct (%) 2013 cohort n correct (%) P value
Knowledge questions
 Prevalence of delirium in acutely admitted patients 434 (56) 986 (82) <0.01
Essential diagnostic criteria (DSM)
 Acute onset 682 (89) 1,051 (87) 0.41
 Inattention 249 (34) 594 (50) <0.01
 Disorientation 116 (15) 200 (17) 0.39
 Agitation 360 (47) 619 (52) 0.06
 Altered arousal 388 (45) 533 (45) 0.96
 Visual hallucination 463 (62) 857 (72) <0.01
 Altered sleep wake cycle 388 (52) 566 (47) 0.03
 Altered mood 537 (72) 869 (73) 0.89
 Disorganised thinking 116 (15) 380 (32) <0.01
Have you used a validated assessment tool for delirium? 64 (9) 407 (35) <0.01
Understanding risk of dementia following delirium 532 (69) 904 (76) <0.01
Understanding risk of institutionalisation following delirium 509 (66) 767 (64) 0.35
Understanding risk of death following delirium 474 (62) 757 (63) 0.47
Understanding that delirium is under-diagnosed 634 (81) 434 (87) <0.01
Understanding that delirium is partly preventable 449 (58) 1,047 (80) <0.01
Awareness that benzodiazepines are not first line treatment in delirium 561 (72) 886 (82) <0.01
Attitude questions
 Self-rated confidence in delirium diagnosis 239 (21) 399 (36) <0.01
 Self-rated confidence in delirium management 686 (31) 1,015 (33) 0.22
 Perception of drug overuse due to staffing constraints 637 (82) 948 (79) 0.09

Percentages calculated using denominator of completed answers. Answers in relation to the Attitude Questions refer to participants reporting ‘Strongly agree’ or ‘Agree’.