Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 18;9(4):269–280. doi: 10.1177/1756285616643892

Table 1.

Patient characteristics.

Fingolimod (n = 22) Natalizumab (n = 11) Interferon (n = 7) Overall (n = 41*)
Sex: male/female 8/14 4/7 3/4 15/26
Age in years: median (range) 35 (21–60) 35 (23–51) 29 (20–48) 35 (20–60)
Time since diagnosis in months: median (range) 68 (10–300)# 28 (1–276) 24 (1–48) 42 (1–300)
EDSS
 Baseline: median (range) 2.5 (1–6) n = 22 2.5 (1–4) n = 11 1.0 (1–1.5)# n = 7 2.5 (1–6) n = 41
 6-month follow up: median (range) 2.5 (1–6) n = 20 2.5 (1.5–3.5) n = 11 1.5 (0–1.5)# n = 5 2.5 (0–6) n = 37
 12-month follow up: median (range) 2.5 (2–6) n = 19 2.5 (1–3.5) n = 10 1.5 (1–2.5)## n = 5 2.5 (1–6) n = 35
Visual function score within the EDSS
 Baseline: median (range) 0.0 (0–4) n = 22 0.0 (0–2) n = 10 0.0 (0–1) n = 6 0.0 (0–4) n = 39
 12-month follow-up: median (range) 0.0 (0–4) n = 21 0.0 (0–2) n = 10 1.0 (0–1) n = 6 0.0 (0–4) n = 38
Functional deficit of the dominant arm (paresis, ataxia)
 Baseline, number of patients 8, n = 22 1, n = 11 0, n = 11 9, n = 41
 12-month follow up, number of patients 10, n = 22 4, n = 10 0, n = 6 14, n = 39
Medication within 6 months prior to study n = 22 n = 10 n = 6 n = 39
 None 4 4 1 9
 Interferon beta 1a 10 3 1 14
 Interferon beta 1b 2 1 4 7
 Natalizumab 3 0 0 3
 Glatiramer acetate 2 2 0 5
 Fingolimod 0 0 0 0
 Azathioprine 1 0 0 1
*

Including the patient treated with glatiramer acetate; #group differed significantly (p < 0.05) from the other two groups; ##group differed significantly from the fingolimod, but not the natalizumab group; EDSS, Extended Disability Status Scale. In some cases, n differed from the group n given in the first line due to missing data. Therefore, those changed n are indicated in the respective table cells.