Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 13;6(6):e008107. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008107

Table 5.

Risk ratios comparing care seeking in Newhints compared with control zones (a) at baseline and (b) within the evaluation cohort

SEQ Care seeking in Newhints vs Control zones
Baseline: 2005–2007
Evaluation cohort: November 2008–December 2009
Adjusted RR (95% CI) p Value Adjusted RR (95% CI) p Value
OVERALL 1.00 (0.82 to 1.24) 0.93 1.43 (1.18 to 1.72) <0.0001
SEQ1 (poorest) 1.00 (0.83 to 1.21) 0.99 1.94 (1.32 to 2.84) 0.001
SEQ 2 0.95 (0.64 to 1.43) 0.82 1.53 (1.04 to 2.25) 0.029
SEQ 3 1.18 (0.87 to 1.59) 0.29 1.74 (1.20 to 2.51) 0.003
SEQ 4 1.20 (0.82 to 1.76) 0.35 1.10 (0.75 to 1.60) 0.64
SEQ 5 (least poor) 0.82 (0.63 to 1.07) 0.14 0.89 (0.59 to 1.35) 0.60
Interaction of SEQ and intervention group χ2(4df)=5.60 0.23 χ2(4df)=9.73 0.045

SEQ, socioeconomic quintile.