Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 22;7:168. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00168

Table 1.

Protective effect of ARBME and ARBWF against CCl4 intoxicated HepG2 cell lines.

Group no. Treatment % Cell viability LDH (U/L)
1 Group-I Normal control 99.42 ± 0.26 96.64 ± 1.67
DMSO control (0.25% V/V) 98.19 ± 0.18 95.47 ± 1.45
Silymarin control (200 μg/ml) 98.56 ± 0.21 97.18 ± 1.58
ARBME (200 μg/ml) control 98.07 ± 0.19 97.73 ± 1.76
ARBWF (200 μg/ml) control 97.84 ± 0.22 96.29 ± 1.41
2 Group-II Toxin CCl4 control (1% v/v) 19.72 ± 0.26 197.64 ± 3.38
3 Group-III Silymarin 50 μg/ml + CCl4 (1% v/v) 68.22 ± 0.21 123.37 ± 2.19
Silymarin 100 μg/ml + CCl4 (1% v/v) 76.47 ± 0.18 115.42 ± 2.35
Silymarin 200 μg/ml + CCl4 (1% v/v) 88.39 ± 0.24 106.42 ± 1.84
4 Group-IV ARBME 50 μg/ml + CCl4 (1% v/v) 39.64 ± 1.20 182.71 ± 2.46
ARBME 100 μg/ml + CCl4 (1% v/v) 45.27 ± 1.23 159.65 ± 2.21
ARBME 200 μg/ml + CCl4 (1% v/v) 52.66 ± 1.17 142.56 ± 1.87
5 Group-V ARBWF 50 μg/ml + CCl4 (1% v/v) 47.25 ± 1.26 151.19 ± 1.49
ARBWF 100 μg/ml + CCl4 (1% v/v) 56.17 ± 1.21 138.24 ± 2.17
ARBWF 200 μg/ml + CCl4 (1% v/v) 64.42 ± 0.95 129.68 ± 1.41

All the results were expressed in mean ± SD (n = 3). P < 0.05 in comparison of group-II with group-I. P < 0.05 in comparison of groups-III, IV, and V with group-II. ARBME, A. reticulata bark methanol extract; ARBWF, A. reticulata bark water fraction.