5. Optimal information size calculations: fixed‐dose combinations versus single‐drug formulations (Comparison 1).
Outcomes | Assumed risk | Clinically important reduction | Optimal sample size 1,2 | |
Single‐drug formulations | Absolute | Relative | ||
Treatment failure | 2.2 % | 0.5% | 25% | 6092 |
Relapse | 2.3 % | 0.5% | 25% | 4718 |
Death3 | 0.9 % | 0.1% | 4.5% | 737,340 |
Sputum/culture conversion at end of treatment | 88.7% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 95,044 |
Serious adverse events | 1.5 % | 0.1% | 6.7% | 12,356 |
Adverse events leading to discontinuation of therapy | 4.1 % | 0.5% | 24.4% | 325,024 |
1We based all calculations are based on: 1‐sided tests, with a ratio of 1:1, power of 0.9, and confidence level of 0.05. 2We performed all calculations using: http://www.sealedenvelope.com/power/binary‐noninferior/. 3 If there is truly no difference between the standard and experimental treatment, then 737,340 participants are required to be 90% sure that the upper limit of a 1‐sided 95% confidence interval (CI) (or equivalently a 90% 2‐sided CI) will exclude a difference in favour of the standard group of more than 0.1%.