Skip to main content
. 2016 May 17;2016(5):CD009913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009913.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Brändli 1989 Controlled clinical trial that compared FDCs versus single‐drug formulations for pulmonary TB, but with 2 different treatment regimens in intervention and control groups.
Brändli 1993 RCT that compared FDCs versus single‐drug formulations for pulmonary TB, but with 2 different treatment regimens in intervention and control groups.
Chu 2004 RCT that compared 2 FDCs: Chinese fixed‐dose compounds (2FEISU/4FEINING regimen) with 2RIFANAH/4RIFINAH regimen for new smear positive pulmonary TB participants, presented as an abstract for the 9th Congress of the Asian Pacific Society of Respirology 10–13 December 2004, Hong Kong. Complete data were unavailable.
Cowie 1990 RCT that compared FDCs versus single‐drug formulations for pulmonary TB, but with 2 different treatment regimens in intervention and control groups.
Dubra 1972 RCT that compared 2 different regimens of treatment for pulmonary TB administered as single‐drug formulations.
Ferreira 2013 Descriptive study of use of 4FDCs tablets for pulmonary TB.
Glatthaar 1991 RCT that compared FDCs versus single‐drug formulations for pulmonary TB, but with 2 different treatment regimens in intervention and control groups.
González Montaner 1978 RCT that compared 2 different regimens for pulmonary TB.
Herman 2007 RCT that compared FDCs versus single‐drug formulations for pulmonary TB, and was presented as a poster in the 12th Congress of the Asian Pacific Society of Respirology. Completed data were unavailable.
HKCS/BMRC 1989 RCT that compared FDCs versus single‐drug formulations for pulmonary TB, but also included TB participants that were already treated.
ISRCTN95204603 RCT that met the inclusion criteria of this Cochrane review according to published protocol, but is not yet published. Data were unavailable.
Macnab 1994 Controlled clinical trial that compared FDCs versus single‐drug formulations for pulmonary TB, but had 2 different treatment regimens in intervention and control groups.
Merle 2012 Descriptive study of methodological issue of unpublished RCTs (registration: ClinicalTrial.gov database: NCT00216385). Compared 4FDCs tablets versus 3FDCs + Gatifloxacin for pulmonary TB.
Punnotok 1995 RCT that compared different treatment regimens (2Rifater/4Rifinah versus 2Rifater+E/6H+Thiacetazone) for untreated, sputum positive pulmonary TB.
Soehardiman 2007 RCT that compared FDCs versus single‐drug formulations for pulmonary TB, and was presented as a poster in the 12th Congress of the Asian Pacific Society of Respirology. Completed data were unavailable.
Sokolova 1993 Study compared FDCs versus single‐drug formulations for pulmonary TB. It is unclear whether or not this is a clinical trial, as there is no mention of allocation or randomization.
Xu 2004 RCT that compared FDCs versus single‐drug formulations, but with 2 different treatment regimens in intervention and control groups.

Abbreviations: FDCs: fixed‐dose combinations; TB: tuberculosis; RCT: randomized controlled trial.