Table V.

Comparison of relative abundance of taxa found to be significantly different at the genus level as shown in Table IV. Relative abundance was calculated based on 6280 total sequences and reported as percentage (%)

	Energy intake	Fat intake	A1c	25(OH)D	Delta 25(OH)D
Genus	Q1 vs Q4	Q1 vs Q4	Q1 vs Q4	Q1 vs Q4	Q1 vs Q4
Relative taxon abundance (%)
Bacteroides	45.4, 31.1	45.5, 24.4	44.6, 31.6	ns	ns
Prevotella	ns	3.7, 13.8	ns	ns	ns
Lachno; g-	3.8, 3.1	ns	ns	ns	4.1, 2.4
Lachno; Ruminococcus	1.6, 0.9	ns	ns	2.1, 1.0	2.2, 0.9
Lachno; Blautia	ns	ns	ns	2.7, 1.3	2.9, 1.2
Lachno; Roseburia	ns	ns	ns	3.2, 1.0	3.0, 0.8
Lachno; Dorea	ns	ns	ns	ns	2.2, 0.6
Rumino; Faecalibacterium	ns	ns	3.2, 15.9	ns	ns
Copro; Catenibacterium	ns	ns	0.6, 2.2	ns	ns
Streptococcus	ns	ns	0.7, 2.4	ns	ns

Abbreviation: ns, not significant.