Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 22.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Jan 6;67(6):714–720.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.11.034

Table 4.

Changes in ED use according to primary reason for visit (Clinical Classifications Software category), 2009 to 2011.

CCS Category Estimated Change in Number of Visits, % (95% CI)* Estimated Change in Probability of Visit, %
Overall −0.5 (−0.8 to −0.1) 0.2 (−0.1 to 0.5)
Injury and poisoning 0.1 (−0.5 to 0.8) 0.5 (−0.1 to 1.1)
Ill-defined conditions 0.1 (−0.8 to 1.0) 0.6 (−0.2 to 1.4)
Complications of pregnancy or childbirth −3.7 (−4.9 to −2.6) −3.7 (−4.6 to −2.7)
Respiratory system diseases −0.8 (−1.7 to 0.1) −1.0 (−1.9 to −0.2)
Genitourinary diseases 0.3 (−0.7 to 1.3) 0 (−0.9 to 1.0)
Digestive system diseases −0.2 (−1.2 to 0.9) −0.4 (−1.4 to 0.6)
Nervous system diseases −0.1 (−1.2 to 1.0) 0.3 (−0.7 to 1.3)
Mental illness 0.4 (−1.1 to 1.8) 2.6 (1.3 to 3.9)
Musculoskeletal diseases −0.2 (−1.5 to 1.0) 0.4 (−0.8 to 1.6)
Skin diseases −3.3 (−4.8 to −1.9) −3.1 (−4.4 to −1.8)
Circulatory system diseases 4.9 (3.3 to 6.5) 4.8 (3.3 to 6.3)
Infectious diseases −1.3 (−3.2 to 0.6) −1.5 (−3.3 to 0.3)
Endocrine and metabolic diseases 0.5 (−2.8 to 3.8) 1.4 (−1.4 to 4.4)
Blood diseases 0.8 (−9.8 to 12.7) 0.9 (−4.6 to 6.7)
Neoplasms −2.8 (−10.1 to 5.1) −4.1 (−11.0 to 3.2)
Congenital anomalies 16.6 (−5.4 to 43.6) 14.9 (−2.0 to 34.7)

CCS, Clinical Classifications Software.

*

The modeled relative change in the number of ED visits per patient was estimated with a negative binomial model, with change after the implementation of the ACA provision measured by the interaction of the post-ACA period and the younger age group.

The modeled change in the probability of young adults ever using the ED pre-ACA versus post-ACA was estimated with Poisson relative-risk regression analysis, with change after the implementation of the ACA provision measured by the interaction of the post-ACA period and the younger age group.