Table 3.

Assembly information of the 13 extracted genome bins.

Metagenomic dataset	Figure IDa	Phylogenetic affiliation	No. scaffolds	Total length (bp)	GC (%)	No. essential genes	Completeness (%)b	Coverageb	BlastP (%)c	BlastN (%)c
AW	1	Clostridium sp. UNIVR01 strain	112	4,456,330	30.9	105/105	100	2521.4	81.5	66.4
AW	2	Clostridium sp. UNIVR02 strain	103	5,268,949	29.1	105/105	100	2521.4	89.3	86.5
AW	3	Lactobacillales sp. UNIVR03 strain	270	3,864,387	42.3	72/105	69	645,474.2	83.3	62.1
AW	4	Erwinia billingiae UNIVR04 strain	173	4,663,534	54.7	80/105	76	137.2	99.4	98.1
AW	5	Pantoea vagans UNIVR05 strain	189	4,663,534	55	40/105	38	1448.1	99.2	97.2
TW	6	Pantoea sp. UNIVR06 strain	172	4,234,112	55.4	89/105	85	8.6	93.9	87.8
TW	7	Pseudomonas sp. UNIVR07 strain	233	8,444,622	60.6	66/105	63	630.3	93.1	88.1
TW	8	Pseudomonas syringae UNIVR08 strain	177	4,540,557	59.2	68/105	65	97	98.6	97.1
TW	9	Pseudomonas sp. UNIVR09 strain	224	4,145,951	59.2	14/105	13	274.4	94.1	90.05
TW	10	Paenibacillus sp. UNIVR10 strain	57	5,684,618	40.9	68/105	65	5042.8	81.7	86.5
TW	11	Paenibacillus sp. UNIVR11 strain	70	6,879,406	45.9	104/105	99	5042.8	84	63.8
TW	12	Actinomycetales sp. UNIVR12 strain	246	3,863,727	63.9	80/105	76	4390	83.2	75.7
TW	13	Pseudomonas sp. UNIVR13 strain	96	3,898,344	60.4	75/105	71	207.9	92.4	89.1

The number of the essential genes was estimated using 105 HMM models protein coding essential single copy genes conserved in 95% of all bacteria (Dupont et al., 2012).

^aFigure ID correspond to the number in Figure 5.

^bGenome bins completeness and coverage were calculated as described in the Section Materials and Methods.

^cBlastP and BlastN similarity values based on essential genes.