Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;50(12):6517–6525. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01021

Table 2. Household and Respondent Characteristics at Baseline by Comparison Group.

  comparison group
 
household and respondent characteristics conventional teacher-facilitated p value
female respondent 73.2% 77.0% 0.087
years of education of respondents (regardless of gender)b 2.03 1.72 0.089
household size (people)b 6.05 5.66 0.001
number of children per householdb 0.94 0.94 0.981
with diarrhea in past 2 weeksb 0.18 0.19 0.787
metal roof 28.2% 18.6% 0.001
own radio 25.9% 26.6% 0.809
own television 1.2% 0.7% 0.367
dirty household compound 33.0% 29.7% 0.238
use improved water supplyc 51.3% 51.0% 0.966
water collection time (minutes)b 50.4 40.06 <0.001
attended village meeting in past 2 monthsb 51.7% 38.1% <0.001
visited health post in past 2 monthsb 32.6% 36.8% 0.117
discussed sanitation or hygiene with a neighbor in past 2 monthsb 51.2% 35.8% <0.001
open defecationb 37.7% 47.9% <0.001
own a latrine 84.0% 76.2% 0.001
with accessible handwashing materials 19.0% 11.4% 0.007
owns an improved latrinec 22.7% 20.2% 0.120
primarily uses a shared latrineb 6.3% 5.4% 0.477
primarily uses a communal/public latrineb 1.9% 2.6% 0.423
want to own a latrineb 14.8% 23.4% <0.001
plan to build a latrine in next yearb 14.2% 22.5% <0.001
a

Respondents were heads-of-households, and females were preferred if available. A t test was used to check for significant differences. All values account for unequal selection probability, nonresponse rates, and village clustering.

b

Self-reported by respondent. Remaining variables are surveyor observed.

c

The “improved” variables are based on the Joint Monitoring Program definitions.31,48