Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 22;15:96. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0385-x

Table 3.

Logistic regression result 2004 and 2011, partial effect dy/dx

Level of healthcare utilization
2004 2011
dy/dx z dy/dx z
Ln annual housheold income per capita −0,013 −0,43 −0,017 −1,20
Chronic sickness or disability 0,083 1,58 0,130 4.28c
Acute sickness past 30 days 0,052 1,19 −0,008 −0,35
Gender (women versus men) −0,049 −1,00 0,012 0,39
Age 0,007 0,71 0,003 0,44
Age square −0,009 −0,86 −0,006 −1,16
Urban versus rural 0,184 2.34b −0,029 −0,70
Marital status (Divorced/separated)
 Single, never married −0,057 −0,36 0,102 1,17
 Married 0,034 0,36 0,080 1,48
Educational level (Senior secondary or higher)
 No school or incomplete primary −0,348 −2.43b −0,142 −2.17b
 Primary −0,259 −1.77a −0,134 −2.48b
 Junior secondary −0,145 −0,98 −0,095 −1.90a
Employment (non-agricultural work)
 Agricultural work −0,213 −2.66c −0,165 −3.79c
 Odd work −0,075 −0,82 −0,122 −2.27b
 Retired 0,041 0,33 −0,071 −1,19
 Not in labor force 0,047 0,45 −0,036 −0,76
Insurance type (Insurance from village/New rural cooperative)
 Insurance from work unit (2004)/Public or urban workers insurance (2011) 0,640 2.95*** 0,504 6.47c
 Social insurance (2004)/Urban residents insurance (2011) 0,000 0.00 0,236 3.60c
 Other insurance 0,282 1,03 0,164 3.46c
 No insurance 0,469 2.61c 0,139 2.12b
 N 471 1971
 chi2 71,69 188,06

aSignificance at the 10 % level

bIdem., 5 %

cIdem., 1 %