Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 May-Jun;23(3):384–392. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.03.090140

Table 3.

Summary of Key Stakeholder Perspectives on Medical Home Principles

Primary Care Providers Clinic and Health System Administrators Insurers and Payers Policymakers
Personal physician Familiar concept
Highly valued
Familiar concept
Not highly valued
Familiar concept
Not highly valued
Familiar concept
Somewhat valued
Physician-directed medical practice Foreign concept
May be reluctant to participate in team- based care
Good understanding of team dynamics and differing roles of primary care team members Very limited understanding of team-based primary care Very limited understanding of primary care teams and roles
Whole-person orientation Familiar concept
Important core value of primary care
Limited understanding of concept
Not highly valued
Limited understanding of concept
Not highly valued
Some understanding of concept
Somewhat valued
Care is coordinated and/or integrated Limited understanding of care coordination strategies (patient-level focus)
Sometimes part of current practice
Variable understanding
Limited understanding of care coordination strategies (systems-level focus)
Some understanding
Some understanding of concept
May not link care coordination to the medical home (caved out services)
Highly valued
Some understanding of concept
Limited understanding of quality improvement
Not valued
Quality and safety Variable desire to participate in new projects
Skeptical of new requirements/oversight
Importance driven by regulatory and licensure requirements Favor tighter regulation and oversight of primary care to improve quality and safety Highly valued (regulatory mindset)
Enhanced access Well understood
Limited support because of overwork of providers in current system
Well understood
Customer-service mentality
Well understood (emphasis on customer service and costs)
May not link to medical home
Well understood
Somewhat valued
Payment Very highly valued, of critical importance
Skeptical of pay-for-performance
Very highly valued, of critical importance
Skeptical of new payment methodologies
Very sensitive to rising health care costs
Likely to demand proof of value/cost savings
Extremely sensitive to overall system costs and impact on health care budgets
Supportive of demonstrations